‹header›
‹date/time›
Click to edit Master text styles
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
‹footer›
‹#›
Basic outline of tree – note shallow
divergences (rapid radiation is a possibility?)
Only 1 outgroup available
with all 3 data sets, but other analysis up to 4 outgroups confirms monophyly
of ingroup
Example of minor differences seen between
nuclear and chloroplast data sets – no supported differences
- parsimony
showed largely similar results bar A. peruviana – this difference is not
supported by Bayesian analysis, so attributed to better model specification
rather than a real difference in position
Analyses support species groupings based
on morphology
Spore morphology is usually consistent
with species delimitation. In one case the
spore morphology is identical for two samples that are in different parts of the
tree. Reason? Convergent evolution? Symplesiomorphy? Interpretation?
Basic outline of tree – note shallow
divergences (rapid radiation is a possibility?)
Only 1 outgroup available
with all 3 data sets, but other analysis up to 4 outgroups confirms monophyly
of ingroup
Austrofossombronia is not monophyletic in
this analysis.
Analyses support species groupings based
on morphology